One well-wisher who read my post on Brahma commented that I erred in equating the Brahma with Brāhman (pronounced ‘BraahmaN’).
It is not that I equated the two but expressed that the word Brahma gave rise to the word BraahmaN. The latter word came into represent ‘the one who knew about Brahma’. Here the ‘Brahma’ or the ‘Brahman’ (pronounced ‘brahman’) meant the refined theological / metaphysical and esoteric concept of Brahma, the cosmic power that created the universe as well as the supreme power that pervades the universe. Subsequently, the word ‘brahma’ also meant large and gigantic (‘bruhat’). Words like Brahmanda ( literally means ‘the gigantic egg’ =universe), brahma-rakshsha, brahma-ratha, naga-brahma etc came into usage.
My objective of reconstructing the original legend and further the concept of Brahma is to understand the evolution of our religious beliefs from the historical and sociological viewpoint. I am not elaborating the theological aspects that are reasonably well known since it has been dealt extensively by others so far.
A historic heroic person, a leader of masses, Abraham, who claimed to be the creator of tribes, became a legend during his life time and also after his death. He is cited in the Bible and is revered as a leader by the Jews and as a prophet (Ibrahim) by Muslims. The Vedic scholars accepted him as the creator and the ultimate cosmic power. The legend of Abraham/Brahma was spread throughout the connected geographic region of West Asia-Asia Minor-and Central Asia.
The Vedic people and contemporaneous Jews had deep-seated rivalry, in spite of both communities sharing many common concepts and beliefs. Whatever words starting with A the Jews used, Vedics used it without initial A. (It may be the other way round also.) So Ahura or Asura of Jews became Sura for Vedics. (Recall the Sura-Asura wars described in Puranic legends.) Avesta became Veda. Abraham became Brahma and so on.
Some more discussion on the word ‘braahmaN’: The word is composed of ‘brahma + aN’. The word ‘aaN’ is a Tulu word meaning a male person. AaN+ jovu (literally ‘male being’ refers to man) in Tulu. Interestingly, the word ‘jovu’, currently used in Brahmin Tulu to refer to the girl child, is also related to the Sanskrit word ‘jeeva’.
It appears to me that the word ‘aaN’ was borrowed into early Sanskrit from Tulu like some of other words discussed in earlier postings. So the word braahmaN originally meant young male who studied scriptures relating to the knowledge of Brahma, the cosmic power. Perhaps, Prof Michael Witzel may throw better light on the status of the suffix /word ‘aaN’ in Brahman and also ‘jovu’ to ‘jeeva’ conversion or vice versa.
On the whole, these discussions further affirm my theory that atleast some Tulu ancestors dwelled in the Pirak civilized habitation in Sind, Baluchistan during the early historical period when Vedas were composed. The Tulu ancestors that migrated carried the worship of Brahma in the form of ‘Bermer(u)’ to Tulunad their subsequent homeland.
The image of Tulu Bermer (Brahma) was akin to the original form of Abraham, the horse riding hero. In a way these Tulu ancestors were following the ancient cult of hero worship that became the spirit worship after the death of the Abraham. The cult of hero worship (example: Koti- Chennaya, Kanthabare- Boodabare etc) and spirit worship (example Panjurli, Kalurti, Kodamanthaya etc) have continued to persist in Tulu culture even to date.
On second thinking, it appears that cult of Brahma worship was more widespread in India in the past till the ascent and domination of Shaivism. Along with the Tulu people, migrating other Dravidian like Kannada and Tamil ancestors carried the Brahma cult to different parts of southern India as evidenced by the relics of Brahma temples and Brahma name tags like Brahmaiah, Bommaya, Brahmasandra etc. The Jainism absorbed many features of the Brahma cult.
Therefore, the legend of Brahma stands testimony to trace the evolution and transition of our theological faiths from the primitive hero/spirit worship to the concept abstract cosmic powers at higher philosophic metaphysical levels on one hand and that of Hindu Gods in human forms at the other popular level.
®
The image of Tulu Bermer (Brahma) was akin to the original form of Abraham, the horse riding hero.
ReplyDeleteThat is a very interesting point. Is there any online material that describes the horse mounted Abraham?
By the way, I have read that Khandoba in Maharashtra, Mailara in Karnataka and Mallanna in Andhra was initially horse mounted hero protecting pastoral communities. I wonder how closely that deity is related to Bermer/Shasta/Ayyanar.
Interesting infos. I do not remember online material on horse mounted Abraham except, the "mass leader", who "fled" to another neighboring country etc tags. Maybe detailed perusal of Bible,Quran and Jewish texts throw more light.
ReplyDeleteYour additional info on horse mounted "heros"-quite interesting.Maybe the result of the influence of the original Brahma concept.
Manju, I need some info which I think you may have: The 'Alukkas' of Kerala and 'Alupas'(the ancient ruling clan) of Tulunad -are they related in some way?
Manju
ReplyDeleteRegarding Abraham's horse I got one myth on the origin arabian horse at www.zoutpan.com. It reads as follows
"There are many myths and theories concerning the origins of the Arabian horse. The traditional legends, including the Bedouin legend above, have shrouded the Arabian's roots in mystery. Another story is that "In the beginning, God gave Ishmael, son of Abraham, a gift, made of mist and dust, as a reward for Ishmael's faith and dedication to the God of his father. Out of the mist and dust came the first Asil Arabian mare, who was at the time in foal, and produced a son. From these two gifts from God came the beginning of the Asil (pure) Arabian horse."
There may be more such data,maybe indirect.
Manju, I need some info which I think you may have: The 'Alukkas' of Kerala and 'Alupas'(the ancient ruling clan) of Tulunad -are they related in some way?
ReplyDeleteI am sorry, Ravi. I don't have any idea on this.
Dear Mr.Ravi,
ReplyDeleteIf you are mentioning to "Alukkas" the jwellery chain group of Kerala then I believe there is no chance of any relation,at all. 'Alukka' or 'Alukkal' is a family name used by a very few Christian families in Thrissur town of Kerala. This Alukka's of the jwellery chain are brothers from one of these families who rose to fame due to their entrepreneurial skill in recent times.Until then this name was not so known to even to those who were residing in or near by thrissur (apart from a bar named Alukkas, in Thrissur which was owned by one of these families).
If they were related to the "Alupas" of Tulunad they would have been known in the history of the cultural capital of Kerala (i.e.Thrissur). At least these families would have made their claims like that, as you can notice that many of the Keralite Christian families are trying to relate themselves with ruling class or Brahmins. Saying that they were brahmins or kshatriyas who were converted by St.Thomas when he visited Kodungalloor, Kerala in A.D.54.(At that point of time Brahmins were not there in Kerala, even if there were a few, chances of conversion to a foreign missionary speaking a foreign language, renouncing all the privileges they enjoyed, not beleivable at all and at least the term Kshatriya for rulers were not inducted in the kerala society)
Regards,
Prashob
Dear Prashob
ReplyDeleteBasically I was interested to know whether 'Aluk(k)a' is a place name in Kerala. Tulunadu and Kerala share a large number of similar sounding place names.
The Alupas were from a village called Alupe.